This essay is--oddly--both threadbare and meandering, and has turns of phrase that look like they were kept from an earlier, tighter version, such as the second sentence's "may have [...] but by".
I read some AI slop earlier today and then read this. The AI slop was better than whatever this is.
You might not be the target audience for this, and that's ok.
Now that people know what ai slop is, they start having higher expectations from prose because vacuous articles like these might be misconstrued as slop