Every single board computer I tested in 2025
bret.dk

・

121 points

・

speckx

・

4 days ago

32 comments

yjftsjthsd-h ・ 6 hours ago

I really wish these lists would talk about software support. If I buy these, do they have mainline Linux support? Will I have security patches in a year? Is there decent distro support, or am I stuck with the vendor's half broken default image?

  • sthlmb ・ 6 hours ago

    Hey! Author of the post someone linked here. Fair comment, though this wasn't really meant to be a review, or "go buy this!" type of post, it was more to highlight what I tested from the boards released in 2025 and share the results to those benchmarks via sbc.compare

    Armbian do a great job of handling support for a whole host of boards (including most I included in this list), so you'll usually have Debian/Ubuntu-based flavours. Vendor kernels and vendor supplied images will be hit and miss. Mainline Linux support is a flag you filter by on the benchmark comparison site linked in the article, but it's a difficult one to keep up to date and define exactly. It could have some kind of support, but miss out on display functionality, or WiFi yada yada. What would we then class as having mainline support? All hardware etc functioning? If so, very, very few will meet that definition.

    I get the desire for the information, and perhaps I should have envisioned these types of questions, but all I initially meant for the post to be was a recap for people following me to see which boards I'd tested that were released last year :D

    • fn-mote ・ 5 hours ago

      > All hardware etc functioning?

      If your standard is "supports suspend/resume", there's even plenty of laptops that won't meet it.

      That gave me a laugh.

      • robinsonb5 ・ 5 hours ago
        ・ 3 more

        Suspend / resume? I'll settle for "keyboard works".

        (From what I've learned so far, some magic incantation is required to convince Linux that a Lifebook E559 is a laptop not a tablet. I'm finding I have way less patience with these side-quests as I get older.)

        • voidmain0001 ・ 4 hours ago
          ・ 2 more

          That laptop has an 8th gen Intel processor which should make it completely compatible with the Linux kernel, yet surprisingly it’s not. https://linux-hardware.org/?probe=2ec391ffdc Did Fujitsu choose an obscure component or interface?

          • yjftsjthsd-h ・ 4 hours ago

            Even on random ARM boards, it's not usually the CPU that's the problem. (It's generally drivers for everything else; eg. a sensor hub that should tell you when a laptop is in tablet mode)

    • usr1106 ・ 4 hours ago

      Interesting: Despite its name Armbian seems to support RISC-V.

      Disclaimer: I have never used any RISC-V board.

  • wojciii ・ 6 hours ago

    Yes, software support is what kills projects for me. I have been burned on boards with terrible support before. No documentation and some Linux kernel patched by someone on crack. Usually the Chinese comments in the patches are a dead giveaway of where the software originated from.

  • ajsnigrutin ・ 2 hours ago

    I've worked with many boards from many vendors for many years now...

    If you need software to be available in 2, 3, 5 years, get a raspberry pi.

    Some might have some software available, some might have patches, some may need manual compiling, some only support debian with 2.4 kernel, some have binary blobs that only work on that 2.4 kernel, some have working usb ports on 2.4 and no gpio, but working gpio with 2.6 kernel but no usb ports, etc.

    Just get a raspberry pi.

    • shadowpho ・ 2 hours ago

      I’d go a step further and say get a mini pc unless you need gpio

heavyset_go ・ 6 hours ago

I basically stopped buying SBCs several years ago, are there any SoC platforms that have mainline Linux support these days? Or is x86 still the way to go?

  • aarroyoc ・ 6 hours ago

    RK3588 is well supported right now and is present in many SBCs

    • doubled112 ・ 3 hours ago

      I am generally happy with my Orange Pi 5, but I have flip flopped between the vendor kernel and a mainline kernel depending on what purpose the OPi5 is serving at that moment.

      There’s also a fairly usable UEFI implementation.

      • heavyset_go ・ 3 hours ago
        ・ 2 more

        Does the vendor kernel support more of the board's peripherals than the mainline kernel?

        Had that issue with some Odroid boards, where the vendor kernel supported MFC hardware acceleration but the vanilla kernel didn't/doesn't. I'd like to avoid that

        • doubled112 ・ 2 hours ago

          Yes, that’s the main reason to run the vendor kernel. Mainline support is improving all the time though.

          I believe I needed the vendor kernel to use video through the USB-C port, and to use the HW acceleration for transcoding in Jellyfin. This situation may have changed since my last attempts.

tripdout ・ 6 hours ago

The BPI-R4 is great for use as a 10G WAN router if your ISP uses PPPoE since the network processing engine has hardware acceleration for it.

Unifi released the UCG-Fiber around a year ago that can also apparently finally handle it, but plenty of threads about slow performance with their UDMs since it's entirely done on the CPU [0].

I'm not the biggest fan of OpenWRT and would prefer something like OPNSense, but it's x86 only and good PPPoE performance isn't guaranteed either - need a CPU with good single core performance that costs more than the BPI-R4, or apparently virtualizing OPNSense allows it to process PPPoE with multiple threads.

0: https://community.ui.com/questions/What-is-the-max-performan...

  • briHass ・ 4 hours ago

    I'm curious why you don't like OpenWRT?

    I've found it to be the better choice for x86 hardware, because it performs so much better on older CPUs. FreeBSD has gotten better with driver support, but the Linux kernel in OWRT is just a better base to build off of.

regularfry ・ 4 hours ago

I find it really weird that it's not until you get to the $200 range that anything has USB-C DP Alt mode support. You'd have though that anyone trying to squeeze space would want to drop full-size HDMI or DisplayPort ports at the first opportunity.

eleventyseven ・ 3 hours ago

> ollama benchmark ... for now, it's purely CPU, with DeepSeek R1 models tested based on the RAM available.

Then the results aren't comparable across different boards across RAM sizes. It'd be better to test a set of different model sizes on all and report -- if it didn't fit. But could you report the full ollama model name and version size slug for each?

> I pull Jeff's fork of the ollama-benchmark software

A link would be nice.

tamimio ・ 6 hours ago

It would be better if there was a table summarized it all.

  • sthlmb ・ 6 hours ago

    What kind of summary are you realistically looking for/expecting in an article like this? (Genuine question, no sass!)

    • tamimio ・ 5 hours ago

      A table or similar where it lists the maker, cost, board name, ram, soc, arch, and maybe other columns like high end/low/budget friendly, and size form factor.

      That would be helpful before you dive into the details, for example, I build drones, and seeing nvidia Xavier specs I would be thrilled about it until I see its size and power consumption. Great article btw!

      • sthlmb ・ 5 hours ago
        ・ 2 more

        Thanks! See my reply below to the other user on this, I think the links to sbc.compare in the article have a lot of the data that you're looking for. I didn't really want to duplicate all of the data I have on the other site, I was more giving a quick recap, with links to the mass of data if people wanted to go that far. Some you mentioned like the dimensions are in the database, but I've not yet exposed them to the frontend.. Ever growing to-do list of life!

        • big_toast ・ 4 hours ago

          I hadn't seen your site before (or been following SBC for a while) and just skimmed the article and was going to move on. (The post was very cool.)

          It wasn't until this thread that I actually clicked through to the sbc.compare. I saw you complement the CIX P1 and Qualcomm in the post but it took looking at the Geekbench numbers on sbc.compare to understand the magnitude of the situation.

          (I guess I'm saying the table might've helped me. But I still appreciate the post as is.)

    • IshKebab ・ 5 hours ago

      Price, CPU performance, RAM, storage, networking, software support outlook.

      I mean really though unless you have a lot of time I don't think there's anything close to worth leaving the software support of Raspberry Pi for.

      • adrianwaj ・ an hour ago

        Yeah, the Pi has a very interesting looking mini-screen addon too.

        https://www.waveshare.com/product/cm4-disp-base-2.8a.htm

        I think being able to switch between a phone and desktop is a great use-case for SBC. Important to be able to attach a power bank and the real bottleneck to adoption: a telco addon.

        Some sort of vibration absorbing case would also be great with a few different varieties around too: https://www.gttwireless.com/raspberry-pi-outdoors/ https://github.com/NebraLtd/IP67-Enclosure

        You could take that SBC with you on a bike, car, around the home, to the worksite. Even a mobile web server for temporary gatherings placed on a high vantage point. Signage is also an important area for SBCs.

        I'd wager on Polymarket that Apple will end up doing something in this space.

      • sthlmb ・ 5 hours ago

        For that I'd really point you towards the links in the article, as that was really what it was supposed to do :D As I mentioned to another person in the comments, this was literally supposed to be a recap of the boards I tested, with links to in-depth benchmark results for each of the boards, with the ability to then filter and compare against around 100 other SBCs that I own and have tested in a controlled manner. Software support is a very tricky one though, sadly. I have a few ideas for little things like being able to search for Armbian support, but others would need a long hard think!

      • tamimio ・ 5 hours ago

        We posted that at the same time!!

        Rpi and also nvidia jetson I would add.

jeden ・ 5 hours ago

please make llm.cpp benchmark on this same model

plagiarist ・ 6 hours ago

I wish comparisons would get into whether or not drivers have been upstreamed far enough where it is possible to run real Linux distros. And whether or not they've made braindead choices about boot device ordering.

veegee ・ 5 hours ago

[dead]