It is a nice UX, but with a fatal flaw: Tiles are supposed to be free when there is a side free, but you instead have it coded to be free when the top or bottom is free. Your app, your rules, so if you intended to do that, cool. It is just a fundamental divergence from how other implementations do it.
Thanks for mentioning this. I played a little bit and I felt like it was the opposite of what I'd remembered. I do like that the inaccessible tiles are faded somewhat so that I don't inadvertently try to match them.
- [deleted]
Thank you for the feedback! I will triple check the rules
> Tiles are supposed to be free when there is a side free
No.
According to wikipedia[1]: "A tile is said to be open or exposed if it can be moved either left or right without disturbing other tiles.". Also look at the photo in the wikipedia article[2]. This implementation looks correct to me.
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahjong_solitaire
[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahjong_solitaire#/media/File:...