33 comments
Not the only "plastic before plastic". There was also shellac, celluloid, cellophane, and a few others. Bakelite, the first 'fully-synthetic' plastic, dates from the early 1900s.
Add to the list galalith: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galalith
Zinc also can be considered plastic of it's age, super maluable.
Polymers supplanted and surpassed gutta-percha everywhere
Gutta-percha is a polymer. It's polyisoprene.
Gutta-percha (Palaquium gutta) is just rubber/latex, no? The Pará rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) overtook it in popularity but it's basically the same natural latex that natural rubber is made from
EDIT: I see they are actually 1,4-polyisoprene but gutta-percha is in a trans configuration while H. brasiliensis latex is in a cis configuration. Not sure if that amounts to any difference in properties https://s10.lite.msu.edu/res/msu/botonl/b_online/e20/20c.htm
It amounts to a huge difference. Cis-polyisoprene has much better stretch and resilience, making it ideal for pneumatic tires. It sealed the economic fates of three continents at once.
You're not allowed to say that on Twitter!
It doesn't have the same properties. It doesn't harden like rubber (before vulcanization was invented) and it is inert, thus immune to organic decay.
I remember reading about Gutta Percha in Neal Stephenson's Mother Earth Mother Board.
"Wildman Whitehouse predicted that sending bits down long undersea cables was going to be easy (the degradation of the signal would be proportional to the length of the cable) and William Thomson predicted that it was going to be hard (proportional to the length of the cable squared).... The two men got into a public argument, which became extremely important in 1858 when the Atlantic Telegraph Company laid such a cable from Ireland to Newfoundland: a copper core sheathed in gutta-percha and wrapped in iron wires."
https://www.bradford-delong.com/2005/07/neal_stephenson.html
Also, the victorian Internet.
Probably almost everyone reading this article has pieces of gutta percha in their bodies, because it remains the filler material of choice for dental root canals.
Almost everyone reading this would have had a root canal procedure done?
I had estimated upwards of 90% given that the article is targeted at English-speaking adults, but https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/iej.13822 suggests that I may have overestimated—across Europe only 60% of people had had a root canal, with less variation between countries than I had expected.
So maybe only 75% of the people reading the article have gutta percha in their mouths.
Wikipedia says gutta-percha was a household word as it was a popular material to make items out of. Interesting to see the word distribution in Google books, it was super popular but seems to have died off quickly.
https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Gutta-percha&y...
The dash in the spelling is unusual (according to books.google), also different languages tell different stories
Russian - looks like a hot topic at the start of WW2 :
https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=%D0%B3%D1%83%D...
German:
https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Guttapercha&ye...
At some point we started calling it latex instead. There's still plenty of stuff made from natural latex. The harvesting of latex from Hevea brasiliensis is almost exactly the same as harvesting latex from Palaquium gutta (gutta-percha)
EDIT: I see they are actually 1,4-polyisoprene but gutta-percha is in a trans configuration while H. brasiliensis latex is in a cis configuration. Not sure if that amounts to any difference in properties https://s10.lite.msu.edu/res/msu/botonl/b_online/e20/20c.htm
Do you REALLY believe that there was a hundred-fold spike in the use of the term gutta-percha in the 5 years between 1869 and 1874, or would you willing to consider that you are looking at spurious data?
Consider a similar new material/technology development --- certainly from 1969--1974 there was presumably a similar spike in the use of the word "computer", which was similarly transformative.
The species has apparently very limited modern distribution: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations?taxon_id=427301
Not much better for the genus: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations?subview=map&taxon_i...
European spindle (brush) also contains this resin
I think your link is broken. Need to scroll past a more recent article on an incident of 19th century American history before the target article on botanicals and golf balls.
I clicked again on the link I posted to make sure it’s correct (https://worldhistory.substack.com/p/plastic-before-plastic) and it brought me directly to the blog post without needing to scroll through anything else. Wondering where the link you clicked on dumped you into?
I think they just missed the segue from the intro (about the caning of Charles Sumner) to the body of the article (about gutta-percha).
The two are only tangentially related in that the cane happened to be made of gutta-percha, and its easy to miss the sentence where they mention this because it's sandwiched between a large image and a form to subscribe to the newsletter.
Yeah my bad. I saw the substack subscribe footer followed by the full Gutta Percha section and figured that it was a separate article. In my defense that was a very circuitous lead in.
Link worked correctly for me
Link works fine.
The link requires reading through the specifics of a violent event from U.S. history so as to pivot off the material used to make the device used as a weapon: gutta percha.
Perhaps the Wikipedia article would serve the discussion?
I think that's what makes this HN submission actually interesting. It underscores how this still relatively new material had become so quickly commodified, ubiquitous, and unremarkable that it played an unknown role in one of the most universally taught moments in US history.
Until today, my only awareness of the term “gutta percha” was as a type of golf ball, as noted in the article. I’ve always assumed it was someone’s name, or else a nickname for a design. What a cool material!
I've seen some pretty interesting stuff made from hardened peat (a Scottish friend of mine, used to make peat jewelry. I have a piece he made for me).
Vulcanized rubber was also quite plasticky.
Rubber is made from (natural) latex. When that latex comes from Palaquium gutta we call it gutta-percha. Nowadays natural latex most commonly comes from Hevea brasiliensis but it's the same thing
EDIT: I see they are actually 1,4-polyisoprene but gutta-percha is in a trans configuration while H. brasiliensis latex is in a cis configuration. Not sure if that amounts to any difference in properties https://s10.lite.msu.edu/res/msu/botonl/b_online/e20/20c.htm
[dead]