Why did you use ChatGPT to write your submission text? I can't speak for everyone, but it makes me much less likely to check out your project as I have less faith in it.
Yes that is true! But the reason is because I do not know english that good I'm not an english speaker, sorry for making the post look spammish
That's fair! I think your english is coming across great by the way. Appreciate the honesty!
One of the things to do is to use it as an editor who can identify things to correct and a translator of your words (in non-english) rather than asking it to generate the material.
For example (and I am a native English speaker but I still make mistakes), https://chatgpt.com/share/d891f9ac-923b-47a8-8de9-ab73017ba9...
By starting from what you write (with your tone and words) it can more accurately maintain that tone and help you identify where you make mistakes and become more proficient in English.
It's not just a submission —— it's a testament to the rich tapestry of prompting.
How did you know OP used ChatGPT?
Three emdash's, "spiritual successor", "modern twist."
So I can't use em dashes, without people thinking I am a bot? :-o. But have to say, the "modern twist" is a weird addition that is not natural. There is nothing modern about it.
Apparently not - a non-technical family member told me this exact thing on the weekend.
Pretty much.
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dash#Usage_in_AI-generated_tex... :
> In April 2025, Rolling Stone reported on the growing perception that the em dash is a hallmark of AI-generated writing, particularly by ChatGPT. The article noted how this idea spread through social media, where users began referring to it as the "ChatGPT hyphen" and how these users advised avoiding it to appear more human.
>So I can't use em dashes, without people thinking I am a bot?
Those are just for ChatGPT specifically, personally I know a ton of peculiarities from a wide variety of models that seem eerily consistent across prompts. You're very unlikely to accidentally use them though, much like spamming em dashes everywhere.
Also this style: "No libraries. No frameworks. Just raw code."
You can use whatever you like, but if you quack like a duck, people might think you're a duck.
I've seen that style plenty before LLMs were a thing, frequently in the demoscene as well.
So to me it seemed totally in character, so to speak.
Here's one to me classic example[1].
Agreed. But for some reason, LLMs seem to use it more often and combined with other tell tale signs it becomes significantly less likely a human wrote it.