Fun fact:
Robert Hooke was rather short of stature. His great rival, Isaac Newton, was petty and vindictive. So when Newton said:
"if I have seen further [than others], it is by standing on the shoulders of giants."
Rather than being humble, he may have actually been having a sly dig at Hooke.
Hooke was a somewhat lower class than the other gentlemen in the Royal Society. He was put in charge of actually producing the demonstrations for the society as “Chief Curator.” His lower class status was useful because he could engage with builders/craftsmen and be present in the pubs and meeting houses to pick up information that was otherwise unavailable to the upper class gentlemen.
It was for this reason that he could introduce things like cannabis (“the account of the plant”) to the royal society. Yet, we was also very much into esoteric philosophy and occult wisdom — much of which came from his upper class access with Boyle (an alchemist)
He also assisted sir Christopher Wren as chief surveyor in rebuilding London after the great fire.
An astonishing career. Total polymath.
He was fascinating. For those interested in reading further I thought this book on him was excellent: https://www.amazon.com/Man-Who-Knew-Too-Much/dp/0333782860
Newton also (allegedly) lost Hooke’s portrait when the Royal Society moved. The two did not get on.
Newton also used (abused) his position as head of the Royal Society to wage a long and bitter feud with Leibnitz over who invented calculus.
Newton was undoubtedly:
a) One of the greatest geniuses who ever lived.
b) A total shit.
Possibly a later myth; the saying predates Newton - also the perceived slight was actually against Hooke's supposed curved spine rather than his height I think.
Here's a quote that predates Newton by some centuries:
"We are like dwarfs on the shoulders of giants, so that we can see more than they, and things at a greater distance, not by virtue of any sharpness of sight on our part, or any physical distinction, but because we are carried high and raised up by their giant size." -- John of Salisbury, The Metalogicon (1159)
https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/978019...
>Possibly a later myth
It is apparently in one of his letters - to Hooke.
Not him saying it; its possibly a myth that it was intended as a slight.