14 comments
Joy, some selfish git endangering others by asserting his right to do whatever. I appreciate it's not going to be a particularly well received comment, but as a Canadian I've been reflecting on Gander and US/Canadian relations and empathy in the past while reading the news lately. And we aren't there anymore. They should just send these two planes and our firefighters back given all the rhetoric and threats of tariffs thrown at Canada lately.
Can they not just patch it up fairly quickly and get it going again due to emergency? or do they have to keep it as is to conduct a whole investigation now.
The repair will have to be performed as per manufacturer documentation by a licensed airframe mechanic and signed off by an inspector. This may or may not be a quick process depending on the severity of the damage and availability of replacement parts. The FAA generally wouldn't grant emergency exceptions to those rules, except perhaps for a ferry flight to another maintenance facility.
The ignorance on this site is a sight to behold at times. A further risk to the aircraft and crew is not to be taken lightly...
''The collision left the CL-415 plane with a "sizable hole in its wing," said Christopher Thomas, a spokesperson with the California state firefighting agency, Cal Fire.''
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/quebec-sopfeu-plane-...
I hope they at least give him a stiff fine to send a message.
The flying of unauthorized drones within firefighting areas is a federal crime punishable by up to 12 months in prison or a fine of up to US$75,000. Catching the person is the first order of business.
Given that they know it was a photographer flying it I had assumed they already did identify him
Stiff fine? I'd hope for jail time. This act could have taken lives.
The fury of all Los Angeles being focused on this will result in:
a) A large fine
b) A lengthy prison sentence
c) The banning of all non-commercial drones in California outside of remote desert areas
d) All of the above
Time to roll out a kill-switch that emergency authorities can use to knock down all unauthorized drones in areas like that. After some fair warning, any drone still flying in such zones would suddenly become dead weight. It might be the only way to guard against this sort of idiocy.
I believe DJI already has this capability:
I'm pretty sure aeroscope is for identification and not killswitch?
Ah yes, like the crypto backdoors only law enforcement use.
E-stopping a drone in flight is about the most dangerous thing you can do if you are worried about hurting someone. My drone has about 25lbs of lithium batteries externally mounted, I'd hate for it to fall on some school bus or firetruck etc.