Wikipedia Searches Reveal Differing Styles of Curiosity

scientificamerican.com

27 points

ripe

a day ago


8 comments

tolerance 5 hours ago

> In countries with higher education levels and greater gender equality, people browsed more like busybodies. In countries with lower scores on these variables, people browsed like hunters. Bassett hypothesizes that “in countries that have more structures of oppression or patriarchal forces, there may be a constraining of knowledge production that pushes people more toward this hyperfocus.”

This is an odd hypothesis and you know, I’ve read a little bit of enough about postmodernism/critical theory and its influence on hypertext to feel like this take is down right saditty.

The need to try to sow conflict between “patriarchy” and “xetriarchy” by depicting one style of curiosity as more virtuous than the other dampens what looks like an otherwise interesting study.

And it doesn’t help that the authors don’t appear to list or accessibly depict which countries were more inclined toward one style as opposed to the other.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adn3268

If anyone can decipher the sophistry in the actual study, please let me know what’s going on here, especially in figure 8.

m463 21 hours ago

I wonder how the word "busybody" was chosen?

A busybody implies someone who is nosey, the type of person that peeks through their curtains at what the neighbors are doing.

The article says:

"In this lexicon, a busybody traces a zigzagging route through many often distantly related topics."

I wonder what is accurate?

fargle a day ago

i'm a rabbit-holer. follow the chain of interesting links from one article to the next over and over to see where i get to with hardly any backtracking. after about 5-6 links it's pretty random. after about 20 who knows where you'll end up.

  • dambi0 a day ago

    Busybody seems an unfortunate name to me, I don’t think it’s a particularly positive label.

    I think there’s also a category difference betweeen hunter / busybody and dancer. The first suggest search strategies the second the utility of thst search. How do we know that hunters and busybodies aren’t just failed dancers?

    • DigitalNoumena 21 hours ago

      There seems to be a deliberate, implicit value judgement about "busybodies" that would explain the negative connotations:

      > Bassett hypothesizes that “in countries that have more structures of oppression or patriarchal forces, there may be a constraining of knowledge production that pushes people more toward this hyperfocus.”

      • jorams 16 hours ago

        The article describes the "hunters" as more focused, so I am fairly certain that statement refers to the "hunters" instead of the "busybodies".

simojo a day ago

> "a busybody traces a zigzagging route through many often distantly related topics. A hunter, in contrast, searches with sustained focus, moving among a relatively small number of closely related articles. A dancer links together highly disparate topics to try to synthesize new ideas."

Depending on my end goal, I'll do a combination of all three.

nitwit005 13 hours ago

I'm not sure I can believe such a study unless there is a "drunk browsing behavior" category.